Saturday, November 27, 2010

Golden Desert Eagle Blueprints

obsidianlily @ 2010-11-28T00: 38:00


Modern Sherlock Holmes, the appeal! You want evidence for your theories? We heard the masters in the art of generalization?
Well, you can start to think again: THIS manual is the basis of generalization and stereotype. On the other hand, it is indisputable proof that your suspicions about the average level of indelligenza of Cosmopolitan readers had a strong and friendly foundation of truth.
I have no words-indeed, I have a couple: it is embarrassing. Men who burst into tears in front of a derby and they should be left alone in front of a proposal for sex? What the committee repressed gay or yet another resurgence of the Peter Pan syndrome? Why or love of the attacker, or start to ask me some questions about how was his relationship with his mother. Or with their lives. O sanity.
But psychosomatic problems do not end here '... like those kisses in the street to tell you, without you, life would not make sense ...' . I like the sneaking suspicion that life has a way with or without a goose at your side. Indeed, he would have no more. But here the acute teacher intervenes to point out that sex is a way for them to strengthen the affection. Behold, here I started to laugh . for them? For them? I have one question: if he refuses to come to bed with you, dear readers, even perjury to love you, what would you think? Ok, right after the 'maybe it's Cullen Eddy camuffato'-well, to my knowledge of female paranoia, I think you are starting from' greased 'and would end with the' do not love me anymore ' through the 'must have been the soup last night'. So, let's face reality-the Y chromosome has nothing to do.
Next commandment: Do not be petulant. Thanks, magazine, without you I would never understand. Because he hates the responsibilities (Well, we hate them a bit 'all) and then the solution is ... a moral deception that he does feel responsible, and the only person who can accomplish the task, and brings you back to the size the maiden in distress. Ah-ah. NO, for a list of reasons. The first is that you're his girlfriend, not his daughter, so would risk an accusation of pedofilila. The second is a thing called empowerment. The third is that to be called 'my brave hero' ritere likely to break out in a totally debilitating, and it would render him unable to bring the station.
Wipe the bowl, let speak 'their language'. Mini front of his starts with an 'It's the latest model? It will have a powerful engine, "': I'm sure it will stretch. From the second attack of laughter.
Sonrvolerò on seven paragraphs in which he talks about his ego, his sense of challenge, of his inability to get indiscussione, and the sense of despair that all these stereotypes causing me to dwell on the absurdity of 22 hours per year of sex. Ok, joking, to me is the hit piece on baldness. 'And if impotence is a problem that few women realize, a head no hair is in plain sight. And who tells him that bald can be a terribly sexy? '. Make an article saying and repeating that masculinity is the focus of a man's life, and then say that he plays more of hair to his penis? I feel cheated.
If this is an indication of women's readings ad hoc could almost rather be born a man. Even if it starts talking to my car.

0 comments:

Post a Comment